VTbxrFan
Boxer Insane
You are absolutely right, but that doesn't make them responsible. Not all BYBs are in it for money, either, but that still doens't make it ok for them to breed. I think the scenario you have in your head is exactly the one that was hardest for me to see the problem with - kind, decent people who love their dogs, treat them well, and breed - maybe even just a litter or two - because they think it will be a neat experience since they love boxers so much. They try to carefully screen homes, and in the end, they sell the pups for a price that allows them to "break even" rather than make a profit. It was really hard for me to understand why this was bad until I started learning about health issues that are genetic but don't show up until later - so the "healthy" parents end up with issues a few years after the breeding that are passed on to the puppies...who in turn are passing them on to more puppies. To really be able to say a puppy comes from healthy lines, you need more than one generation and you need health testing that can identify problems before symptoms show up. And as a side note, these breeders can sell their dogs for a lower price than reputable breeders because they aren't doing health testing or showing, which makes it much easier for them to break even by selling pups for $300 dollars.tanya&jazz said:Not everyone that advertizes in the paper are in it for the money.
But it's not just a health issue. Afterall, even the very best breeders can't promise lifelong good health. The other issue is breeding to improve the breed, and these well-intentioned families who are breeding for "fun" (or hobby or whatever word you want to use that implies something other than for profit) simply do not have the knowledge and experience to breed for improvement. The result of that is boxers that look less and less like the breed standard. You might think that's not a problem if you don't intend to show, but consider the fact that if that type of breeding continues, in 25 years, the boxer we know and love today won't exist because it will have changed so much. In my state, where BYB's run rampant, I see more purebred boxers that actually look like mixes than those that are good representatives of the breed because the breeding practices are so bad. And it's not just the looks that change with bad breeding - it's the personalities.
You are absolutely right - if a healthy dog is the number one priority for a person, the only way to go is a reputable breeder who knows the pup's line for several generations. But I do want to make one point very clear - it's a crap shoot getting a pup from rescue/shelter just like it is if you get a pup from a less than responsible breeder, but there is a very important difference - who gets the money. If you buy a puppy from an irresponsible breeder, you are encouraging that practice to continue, which means you are directly supporting irresponsible breeding habits that will lead to the demise of the breed. Even the BYBs who aren't in it for money will think twice if they can't get any money at all for the pups because they are putting money into them. (The neat experience of having one litter of puppies becomes a lot less fun if it puts you hundreds of dollars in the hole.) If they lose money instead of breaking even (or making a profit), the cycle will start to break down. When you adopt a dog from a rescue or shelter, you usually do pay an adoption fee, but that fee is not supporting irresponsible practices - it's treating dogs that need health care and it's paying for spays/neuters to break the cycle of homeless pets.tanya&jazz said:I know LOTS of people that have got their pups from the paper. If health concerns are your reason for not going this route then stay away from the rescue because that is a REAL crap shoot.
I do not want puppy mills supported.