jeffbotteril
Boxer Booster
It's a personal choice for the owner in countries that allow cropping certainly.
Given the option which we do not have in the UK and other countries to crop, I'd decline for much the same reasons as have already been given by others. The natural ears are IMO a plus in the looks dept. for a boxer and I would not want to cause the dog pain and/or discomfort merely for cosmetic purposes.
However, I can understand how in certain countries such as the US, if performed correctly why some owners prefer the ears cropped.
The following would have swayed the argument against cropping for me as a personal choice should I have been given one:
The "Mutilations Report" by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) in the UK states:
"Cropping of ears
This procedure is unacceptable in that it is carried out for reasons of fashion only, with no benefit to the dog."
http://www.rcvs.org.uk/Templates/Pr...stParentNodeID=89642&int2ndParentNodeID=89738
-------------------
"The Wansbrough Report
Australian Veterinary Journal Vol 74, No. 1, July 1996
INCORRECT MYTHS ABOUT PAIN.
Several myths about pain have been propagated for years and form the basis on which cosmetic tail docking has been justified and allowed to be perpetuated.
MYTH 1 - Animals don't feel pain like humans. This is illogical. Anatomically and physiologically mammals(and possibly all vertebrates) have the same neural transmitters, receptors, pathways and higher brain centres.
Whilst it is true that animals may show different signs of pain, we cannot deny that they feel pain in the same way humans do (Fleeman 1995). Because of the physiological similarity between mammals, it is valid to use animals, including dogs, as models for human medical research.
The converse applies in that man can be used as a model for advancing veterinary knowledge. Similarity between the human and canine nervous systems means that we can assume that anything causing pain in man will cause a painful sensation of similar intensity in the dog.
The pain threshold has been determined to be approximately equal in humans and animals
(Fleeman 1995)."
Given the option which we do not have in the UK and other countries to crop, I'd decline for much the same reasons as have already been given by others. The natural ears are IMO a plus in the looks dept. for a boxer and I would not want to cause the dog pain and/or discomfort merely for cosmetic purposes.
However, I can understand how in certain countries such as the US, if performed correctly why some owners prefer the ears cropped.
The following would have swayed the argument against cropping for me as a personal choice should I have been given one:
The "Mutilations Report" by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) in the UK states:
"Cropping of ears
This procedure is unacceptable in that it is carried out for reasons of fashion only, with no benefit to the dog."
http://www.rcvs.org.uk/Templates/Pr...stParentNodeID=89642&int2ndParentNodeID=89738
-------------------
"The Wansbrough Report
Australian Veterinary Journal Vol 74, No. 1, July 1996
INCORRECT MYTHS ABOUT PAIN.
Several myths about pain have been propagated for years and form the basis on which cosmetic tail docking has been justified and allowed to be perpetuated.
MYTH 1 - Animals don't feel pain like humans. This is illogical. Anatomically and physiologically mammals(and possibly all vertebrates) have the same neural transmitters, receptors, pathways and higher brain centres.
Whilst it is true that animals may show different signs of pain, we cannot deny that they feel pain in the same way humans do (Fleeman 1995). Because of the physiological similarity between mammals, it is valid to use animals, including dogs, as models for human medical research.
The converse applies in that man can be used as a model for advancing veterinary knowledge. Similarity between the human and canine nervous systems means that we can assume that anything causing pain in man will cause a painful sensation of similar intensity in the dog.
The pain threshold has been determined to be approximately equal in humans and animals
(Fleeman 1995)."