I think you might find that that depends a great deal on where people live. And this is an international communityBuffalo said:Strangely though most aren't "pro-natural tail" or "pro dewclaws". I guess it's cool to remove them because...I don't know, it just is, right?

Actually, it wasn't. The boxer is descended from bullbaiting dogs (it was never used for this purpose itself, just descended from dogs that were) and the "original purpose" as stated by the standard was as a "companion dog, for horse, bycycle or carriage". It was only later that the breed found use as a working dog.The breed was created as a working dog - cropped ears were part of their "uniform". Now that they are family dogs natural ears are acceptable, but if not for their original purpose there would be no boxer for you to have.
Ear cropping is almost certainly the result of prevailing fashion at the time of the breed's emergence, and a factor of having been bred from hunting/bullbaiting dogs for whom there was good reason to remove extremities like ears and tails.
