So looking at that, why not pay a little more for piece of mind?
Out of the 4 breeders I found who did health testing some did in various degrees. Some tested hips and thyroid but not heart or eyes... and so on. Most had no pus available and had extensive waiting lists. We ended up getting Diesel from a breeder who tested for everything but hips. They said they hadn't had that problem in their lines at all and we took that chance because they had one pup left and after searching for what seemed like forever we snatched him up.

I don't regret spending a penny extra on the cost of my dog. But to each his own and that is my story and my opinion. Good luck in your search.
I totally agree with you. If someone is going to sell a 'product', it should be the best they can produce or offer. I also, got similar responses from breeders. It seems to me though that some breeders who health test and provide 'quality pups' still cut corners. As you said, many tested a certain thing because they had not had a problem with one or the other. That's really not fair to the buyer, but in the end they are the one making the decision to buy from that breeder or not.
I sincerely hope you mean, the lower price is for pet quality pups, who they only allow limited registration. It is against AKC rules for breeders to base their prices on the registration of dogs.
Yes, I believe so since I know w/limited registration you cannot show the dog, nor would registration be available should that dog produce a litter. The thing I disagree with is 'pet quality vs show quality'. Aside from being white, or more than 1/3. How do you decide which pup is either quality? If they are from the same litter? I would think that the markings would make a difference, but if you have 3,4,5 similar pups, how do you decide?
You get what you pay for. It costs significantly more to be a responsible breeder. A BYB need to only put two dogs together and wait until the puppies arive. Being a responsible breeder involves alot of health testing, vet visits to monitor the pregnancy, vet visits and medication for the puppies, etc. The jb is exponentially more expensive, and that is why they cost more.
That is true. It would have to cost more to do all the health testing, vet visits etc. But how much more should it reflect in the cost of the pup? I thought the reason for responsible breeding is 'to better the breed', not to make a profit? I agree it costs a lot of money to send a healthy litter into the world, but some of these breeders are making a ton of money with these inflated puppy prices.
you have no idea what it cost to produce a litter of puppies if you care and do all the right testing, stud fee, care for the bitch and puppies, the cost of showing the parents till they are finished. I think $1,000 is in no way a crazy amount even for a pet quality you will find byb selling there dogs for 200-300 because they have not done health testing, finished there dogs in the ring or spent the extra time and money to find a quality stud for their bitch. They spend about 50 bucks on shots and tail docking and call it good. In my area the normal for a good show prospect is $2,000. That is around meaning some are more some are less.
You're right, I don't know how much it is to produce a litter and I probably never will but its hard for me to reason that producing a healthy litter of pups would cost between $7000-$18000. I'm just trying to educate myself on this topic. BW is the only place I would trust because ultimately, what we all care for is the best interest of the Boxer. Thanks.