Why the female & not the male and other stuff
The reason I chose to have Marcie spayed and not yet have Dempsey neutered is a biological, and not a sexist, reason. It's simply because Dempsey can't have pups.
Now as to why I haven't had Dempsey neutered yet it's because I may still want to breed him. If and when I do that, I will have all of the health testing done. If, and only if he passes will I breed him. If he doesn't pass then I'll have him neutered.
I know and believe that the only reason to breed is to improve the breed, but I also know that if that were followed 100% of the time most of us on this board would not have Boxers. They'd be far too expensive. Secondly who is to say what's an improvement? Should only Boxers that win in the confirmation ring be bred? What about those that don't win? Should they not be bred even though they're good enough to compete in the ring?
What about Boxers that compete in the agility ring, but aren't "pretty" enough to compete in the confirmation ring? Should they also not be bred? There is also the question of the "invisible" characteristics that can't be seen in the show and agility rings. I'm talking about our Boxers trustworthiness, their reliability, how affectionate they are, there gentleness with children. Those are characteristics that can't be measured in any type of ring, but they're certainly necessary in a Boxer. Would any of us want a show and agility champion that didn't have these "invisible" characteristics? I highly doubt it. Which brings me back to my question "who is to say"? I ask this to be educated, not to be scorned, ridiculed or told that I'm irresponsible or unrealistic.