Carrey_Bazil
Boxer Pal
Hi, this is Abhijit from India. There have been some discussions about back yard breeders here and I would like to share my own experience and some doubts. I got Carrey 4 months ago from someone who I didn't know was a back yard breeder. Later I found out that Carrey has cryptorchidism.
When I went to see the pups the breeder showed his parents who looked very healthy and well cared for. I was told that there were two litters, one registered and the other not registered. I opted for the registered one, and was told that the required papers will arrive a month or two later, which they did, the papers were genuine, in order and issued by the kennel club here. The breeder filled out her share in the trasfer forms and told me to send the completed forms to the KCI representative in the state. I could not see the KCI rep for another two months and when I did, he told me about Carreys condition as he could not see his testicles in the photographs. I was shocked pretty much, but didn't really know what to do. Carrey has become a part of the family now and I don't think I can just take him back and return him to his breeder. Anyway, I handed over the paperwork to the rep and told me to wait a month which I am doing now.
Later, I talked to a vet and he told me that the same thing has happened to the breeders previous stocks. She has only one stud and three bitches, so probably this a hereditary defect from the bitches side; the stud had two testicles when I saw him. It is clear that this woman is breeding specimens which should not be bred. And worse still, getting them legally registered with the Kennel club. The only reason I had bought a pup from her was that the litter was registered.
My question is this, is the kennel club justified in granting registrations to a litter which they know comes from a defective stock ? Can they be held liable to negligence in this matter ?
When I opted for a registered dog, I had put my faith in the Kennel Club, but now I am not sure.
When I went to see the pups the breeder showed his parents who looked very healthy and well cared for. I was told that there were two litters, one registered and the other not registered. I opted for the registered one, and was told that the required papers will arrive a month or two later, which they did, the papers were genuine, in order and issued by the kennel club here. The breeder filled out her share in the trasfer forms and told me to send the completed forms to the KCI representative in the state. I could not see the KCI rep for another two months and when I did, he told me about Carreys condition as he could not see his testicles in the photographs. I was shocked pretty much, but didn't really know what to do. Carrey has become a part of the family now and I don't think I can just take him back and return him to his breeder. Anyway, I handed over the paperwork to the rep and told me to wait a month which I am doing now.
Later, I talked to a vet and he told me that the same thing has happened to the breeders previous stocks. She has only one stud and three bitches, so probably this a hereditary defect from the bitches side; the stud had two testicles when I saw him. It is clear that this woman is breeding specimens which should not be bred. And worse still, getting them legally registered with the Kennel club. The only reason I had bought a pup from her was that the litter was registered.
My question is this, is the kennel club justified in granting registrations to a litter which they know comes from a defective stock ? Can they be held liable to negligence in this matter ?
When I opted for a registered dog, I had put my faith in the Kennel Club, but now I am not sure.