JulieM
Boxer Insane
I absolutely agree that many pitbulls are aggressive, and I agree that often it's genetic. I do not agree that it's the _breed_ - but rather, the irresponsible breeders who either don't know or don't care what they're breeding. Temperament is inherited - circumstances can have a profound and lasting effect, but the innate temperament is something the dog got from its parents. So anytime someone with an aggressive or unstable dog (of any breed) decides to breed it, or anytime someone with a stable, non-aggressive dog breeds it to a dog whose temperament they don't know, there is a chance of an unstable or aggressive puppy. (There is a chance with two stable, non-aggressive dogs too, of course, but it is minimal.) I think most of these aggressive pitbulls are coming from backyard breeders and puppy mills - many of whom are breeding specifically for aggressiveness. The reputable breeders, the ones who know the standard and breed their dogs to meet the standard, cannot afford to breed aggressive or unstable temperaments. Most of the breeders participate in dog shows, and while some ringside posturing is overlooked, a truly aggressive dog will not be tolerated. Of course, even these stable temperaments can be ruined by irresponsible owners who don't socialize or train the dog (which is true of any breed).
Considering this, I think that a large part of the problem is the lack of education of the public. Many people want pitbulls because of their reputation for aggression, which is a problem in and of itself. Many others want them for protection, but are not educated as to what temperament to look for, what questions to ask the breeder, etc. These people are told that the mother has to be locked in another room because she's protective of her 8-week-old puppies, but that's perfectly normal. The father is OK once he gets to know people, but he'll fight with the other dogs so you can look at him in the back yard. These are extreme warning signs, yet your average pet purchaser does not know this and so buys the cute little puppy, hoping it will keep them safe from burglars, and ends up facing a lawsuit and having to put the dog down because it bit the neighbor kid who walked into the backyard when the dog was out there.
Yes, it does get me riled - but not at you, Mike
I get riled at the public who are unaware of the realities and responsibilities of owning a dog, at the media who fan the fires of breed legistlation (more people are bit by Cocker Spaniels than pitbulls, but you don't ever hear about a CS bite on the 6:00 news), at the breeders and puppymillers who take advantage of the unsuspecting buyer, and those who actually boast the fact that they have "Fighting Dogs". I don't agree with condemning the entire breed, although I would agree with condemning a majority of the "breeders" (and I use the term loosely).
Julie
Considering this, I think that a large part of the problem is the lack of education of the public. Many people want pitbulls because of their reputation for aggression, which is a problem in and of itself. Many others want them for protection, but are not educated as to what temperament to look for, what questions to ask the breeder, etc. These people are told that the mother has to be locked in another room because she's protective of her 8-week-old puppies, but that's perfectly normal. The father is OK once he gets to know people, but he'll fight with the other dogs so you can look at him in the back yard. These are extreme warning signs, yet your average pet purchaser does not know this and so buys the cute little puppy, hoping it will keep them safe from burglars, and ends up facing a lawsuit and having to put the dog down because it bit the neighbor kid who walked into the backyard when the dog was out there.
Yes, it does get me riled - but not at you, Mike
Julie