bremle said:
So you should only breed show dogs and never allow the pet dogs to breed,
No, just because a dog is shown doesn't mean it should be bred. Any Boxer that is AKC registered and unaltered can become a "show dog". When a breeder says such and such puppy is a "pet", they're saying those puppies don't fit the standard as closely as they should for breeding...there is something (or some things) about them the breeder does not want to risk being passed on. These puppies are placed as pets on s/n contracts. If you want to breed, make that clear to the breeder and they won't place a pet puppy with you.
are you a super model cause if not then you shouldnt be able to breed either, you see how that sounds, kinda judge mental i think.
Comparing humans reproducing to breeding dogs is comparing apples to oranges. No where near the same.
Each breed of dog has a standard that describes the perfect dog of that breed. The only way a breed can be preserved, is for breeders to strive to produce dogs that come as close as possible to their standard. If not, the characteristics that make up each breed will be lost. If the characteristics are lost, so is the breed.
What is it about a Boxer you love so much...the head piece, build, temperament? Without breeding to standard, these things will be lost. If a Boxer no longer has the temperament of a Boxer, should it still be considered a Boxer? What if the head looks like a Great Dane, should we still call it a Boxer? Bremle, where do you draw the line...how far from standard do you think it's ok for a "Boxer" to be and still be used to produce more "Boxers"?
I'm not tryin to be rude but you all seem to only see one side of it,
No, it seems to me you're the one seeing just one side of it.
and that you can get more money for show dogs than you can get for pet quality which seems like you are in it for the money as well. Just how it sounds to me
It's not cheap to properly breed a litter of puppies...chances are very slim any money will be made. Most breeders do charge more for their "show prospects" than they do their "pets" but most in a litter are sold as pets (one is quite lucky to get even 2 show/breeding prospects in an average sized litter...and if you consider most breeders will keep at least 1 breeding/show prospect from each litter, that leaves very few of those 'money making show pups' to be sold.

). Wouldn't it make more sense to say they're all "show potential" and charge the higher price if one was interested in trying to make money?
From one of your previous posts you said:
I'm sorry but i'm not going to pay 700.00 or more for you to tell me what i can and can not do with my dog.
I'm not sure you understand when you're dealing with a responsible breeder, you're not just purchasing a puppy...you're buying into their breeding program, one that if well established, has taken many years to get to where it is today. Do you honestly think a breeder that has spent many years building a program, building a reputation for their kennel, has put in an unlimited amount of time, effort and money should allow you to take off with one of their pups and do what you want with it? You honestly think you should be allowed to purchase a pet puppy (that evidently has characteristics the breeder does not feel should be passed on), breed it how ever you see fit to whatever you want and destroy the reputation and breeding program that breeder has spent so many years building? Imo, that's extremely selfish on your part.
As I said above, if you want to breed then make that clear to the breeder from the beginning. A responsible breeder isn't going to place a pet puppy in a breeding home. If the breeder feels you can be trusted to do things responsibly, chances are you'll be offered a show/breeding prospect *on a show/breeding contract*. If you truly want to breed for the right reasons, putting it all in writing shouldn't be a problem.
