dlcenters
Boxer Booster
We tried to do "the right thing" by adopting from a rescue org., but our application was denied due to the fact that our dogs are kept in a roofed, walled kennel outside when we are at work. Now, mind you, this kennel is not just a slapshod chainlink fence with plywood or a tarp stuck on the top-it is a 10x10x6 heavy duty dog kennel inside our garage add-on under a constructed roof and sided with regular garage siding-completely protecting the dogs from the weather. They are safe, secure, protected from the weather complete with doghouses, blankies, food and water, toys, etc. and have LOTS of room to move around and play.
The rescue org. considers this leaving them "unattended outside"...?...but stuck inside the house in a 3x4 crate all day long (which is acceptable to them) is better treatment??? I just don't understand. We take extremely good care of our dogs, their kennel is kept cleaner than the neighbors house (a 12x60 ramshackle trailer complete with 2 adults and 6 kids!!!), and when we are home they are with us constantly.
Both of our girls were informal "rescues" and we were going to rescue another since our old girl passed on, but we are unacceptable...could someone please explain how a judgement can be made solely on one point without even personnally meeting prospective "parents" and/or physically viewing the kennel in question. I realize that every organization has the right to set their own guidelines and rules, but rescues preach "adopt, don't buy" and then won't let you adopt when all you want is to give a supposedly "needy" dog a loving home...to me, it seems that once a dog is in "rescue" it has already been rescued-is not at risk for euthanasia anymore and has a home for as long as it takes to find an acceptable new home. The ones that really need rescued are the ones still in the kill shelters and the puppies who "god knows who" will get ahold of. These are the places easiest to acquire a new dog when you want one-no questions asked. If the rescue org. was really about saving these animals, they would look at each case individually instead of "this is our policy no matter what the situation". The standards set for adoption from most rescue org. are so rigid that it makes very few people eligible to even be considered acceptable...
This is just my opinion brought on by my experience...it is very frustrating to know that I wanted to help the best way I know how (by giving a needy dog a home) and I'm not acceptable by their (the rescue org.) standards. I'm not asking them to "lower" their standards-I'm just asking them to look at the whole picture before making a judgement. Alot more dogs could be placed in permanent "forever" homes and make room for even more to be rescued.
The rescue org. considers this leaving them "unattended outside"...?...but stuck inside the house in a 3x4 crate all day long (which is acceptable to them) is better treatment??? I just don't understand. We take extremely good care of our dogs, their kennel is kept cleaner than the neighbors house (a 12x60 ramshackle trailer complete with 2 adults and 6 kids!!!), and when we are home they are with us constantly.
Both of our girls were informal "rescues" and we were going to rescue another since our old girl passed on, but we are unacceptable...could someone please explain how a judgement can be made solely on one point without even personnally meeting prospective "parents" and/or physically viewing the kennel in question. I realize that every organization has the right to set their own guidelines and rules, but rescues preach "adopt, don't buy" and then won't let you adopt when all you want is to give a supposedly "needy" dog a loving home...to me, it seems that once a dog is in "rescue" it has already been rescued-is not at risk for euthanasia anymore and has a home for as long as it takes to find an acceptable new home. The ones that really need rescued are the ones still in the kill shelters and the puppies who "god knows who" will get ahold of. These are the places easiest to acquire a new dog when you want one-no questions asked. If the rescue org. was really about saving these animals, they would look at each case individually instead of "this is our policy no matter what the situation". The standards set for adoption from most rescue org. are so rigid that it makes very few people eligible to even be considered acceptable...
This is just my opinion brought on by my experience...it is very frustrating to know that I wanted to help the best way I know how (by giving a needy dog a home) and I'm not acceptable by their (the rescue org.) standards. I'm not asking them to "lower" their standards-I'm just asking them to look at the whole picture before making a judgement. Alot more dogs could be placed in permanent "forever" homes and make room for even more to be rescued.